Wayne G. Rollins explores in Soul and Psyche the various psychological forces present in, and working
through, all of Christian Scripture. Symbols, for example, are both conscious
and unconscious, and their multiple associations play on both reason and
emotion. This allows the mind which interprets them to work as an integrated
whole.
The archetypical imagery which Scripture employs may be
rich for precisely this purpose: the hero, garden, divine child, wise elder,
trickster, mountain, tree of life, and divine king all resonate deeply through
the minds of many people. And similar power may be at work in the cultic and
ceremonial practices that Scripture encourages, such as the cup and bread that
resound beyond the Greek New Testament.
This dense and varied symbolic, archetypal, and cultic
imagery of Christian scripture has been explored only partially. But Scripture
also attests to a broad array of human personalities which have been studied
since Freud and noted long before. Biblical characters such as Paul and David,
Jesus and Moses, Ruth and Elijah, and Ezekiel and John not only resound with
psychodynamic forces, but may also evince some mastery of them. Jung saw Paul
as an individuated soul, while some Freudians have honored him as a keen
symbolist and the skilled constructor of a mythological world.
It is not that one may find or
“read into” the Bible the suppositions of modern psychological theory. It is
that, when one reads the Bible with such theories in mind, one confronts the
full range of possible results, from the tragic figure of Saul the king falling
prey to his anxieties, to the fascinating complexity of Ezekiel, to the
surprisingly admirable qualities of Christ and Paul. In Scripture, even by our
contemporary standards, one may meet nearly anyone, and do so quite honestly.
A third way that Scripture offers psychological
resources is in the range of religious experiences it describes. The people of
the Christian Bible encounter prophecy and ecstasy, visions, photisms, and
auditions, glossolalia, dreams and dream interpretations, conversion and the
slow work of ordinary religious life which encompasses the entire range of
human emotions. They also perform religious rituals through circumcision,
baptism, eucharist, foot-washing, prayer, fasts, festivals, and cultic law and
sacrifice. They experience angels, exorcise and are possessed by demons, and
heal and are healed by faith and miracle.
The comprehensiveness of Scripture in
this regard leaves little life uncovered. If one were looking for a religious
experience outside its range, one would seem hard pressed to find it. So we should not be surprised that Scripture retains an
ability to affect believers. Throughout its history, Scripture has
engaged the hearts and minds of those who read it. It cannot be for nothing that
John Wesley and Martin Luther both trace historically significant
transformations to their experience of reading the Bible.
More, contemporary research speaks to the positive
effect of biblical stories on the spiritual lives of children. And there has
been a resurgence in adult applications in counseling which use Biblical texts
as agents of moral realism, emotional catharsis, perceptual reorganization,
diagnostic tools, and archetypal models for perception and behavior.
Rollins concludes
that we see such efficacy because of the constructive pervasiveness of the
psyche in Scriptural composition and explication alike.Psychological readings of the Bible reveal that text
and reader interpret one another in ways we have only begun to understand, and
that a hermeneutical process which understands the Bible as therapeutically
authoritative elicits a bevy of therapeutic results.
Rollins implicitly takes up this persuasive sense of
Scriptural authority as he describes the effects Scripture can have on readers.
The unconscious forces operant in Scriptural composition manifest in Scriptural
interpretation. Texts bear more meaning than the author could ever intend or
the reader ever disclose.
Unfortunately, much of this we read as negative, as
in the critical suspicions of Marx, Freud and Nietzche, and the contemporary
theories of feminist, Foucaultian and post-colonial thought. Biblical texts bear
between their words the unspoken ideologies, systemic exclusions, and power
dynamics of their compositional cultures.
But, in ways similar to the unconscious efficacy of the
symbolic imagery of Christian scripture, these same “submerged” structures can
become ways the text positively generates meaning for a reader. The persuasive
nature of Scripture’s contents and unconscious forces can also contribute to
its salutary force. Unconscious saturation prepares the text to respond to
queries which neither text, author or reader anticipated, but that nonetheless
further understanding at an almost experiential level.
The unconscious structures which operate in a text may
make it more intelligible by lending it cohesion, making its meaning or
meanings possible. And if there is any kind of collective unconscious at all, then the
unconscious structures shared by any text with a reader would be precisely those
through which the psyche’s positive energies could work toward inclusion,
service, and empowerment.
Finally, the unconscious “depth structure” of texts engages
the imagination constructively, in order to organize disparate information and
elicit the reader’s enlivened response to it. But I will explore that topic more fully in later essays.